[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e37e3b18-401e-f319-9006-2e2a09111c74@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 22:52:56 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@...e.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+8bee3285b9e190f1509e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: fix UAF race condition in __kernfs_remove()
On 2022/09/25 22:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 10:20:27PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> On 2022/09/25 22:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> Isn't this already handled by:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220913121723.691454-1-lk@c--e.de
>>>
>>> that will show up in the next linux-next tree.
>>
>> Oh, I didn't know that patch.
>>
>> But is that patch complete, for there are three __kernfs_remove() callers?
>>
>
> syzbot seems to think it works :)
syzbot's reproducer tested only kernfs_remove_by_name_ns() case.
I'm not sure whether e.g. __kernfs_remove() from kernfs_remove() is safe.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists