[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220925161926.hc6txrf7yklqen7s@mobilestation>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:19:26 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/23] ata: libahci_platform: Parse ports-implemented
property in resources getter
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:55:59AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 9/20/22 06:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:36:07PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> >> The ports-implemented property is mainly used on the OF-based platforms
> >> with no ports mapping initialized by a bootloader/BIOS firmware. Seeing
> >> the same of_property_read_u32()-based pattern has already been implemented
> >> in the generic AHCI LLDD (glue) driver and in the Mediatek, St AHCI
> >> drivers let's move the property read procedure to the generic
> >> ahci_platform_get_resources() method. Thus we'll have the forced ports
> >> mapping feature supported for each OF-based platform which requires that,
> >> and stop re-implementing the same pattern in there a bit simplifying the
> >> code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c | 2 --
> >> drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 3 ---
> >> drivers/ata/ahci_st.c | 3 ---
> >> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 3 +++
> >> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> >> index 1f6c85fde983..c056378e3e72 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> >> @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static int mtk_ahci_parse_property(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
> >> SYS_CFG_SATA_EN);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - of_property_read_u32(np, "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> >> -
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >> index 28a8de5b48b9..9b56490ecbc3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >> @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (rc)
> >> return rc;
> >>
> >> - of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> >> - "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> >> -
> >> if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
> >> hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> >> index 7526653c843b..068621099c00 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> >> @@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ static int st_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >> st_ahci_configure_oob(hpriv->mmio);
> >>
> >> - of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> >> - "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> >> -
> >
> > With arm:allmodconfig, this results in:
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/ata/ahci_st.o
> > drivers/ata/ahci_st.c: In function 'st_ahci_probe':
> > drivers/ata/ahci_st.c:147:24: error: unused variable 'dev' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> > 147 | struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > Guenter
>
> Just pushed a fix for this in ata tree for-next and for-6.1 branches. The
> problem should be resolved with the next linux-next merge.
Once again thanks for sending the fix for my mistake.
Regards,
-Sergey
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists