linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/5] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yy/IZjq+zVoKpfJ/@sashalap>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 23:17:58 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linusw@...nel.org, kaloz@...nwrt.org, khalasa@...p.pl,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/5] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:04:27PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:57 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-09-21 16:54, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 94e9bc73d85aa6ecfe249e985ff57abe0ab35f34 ]
>> >
>> > This turns the IXP4xx GPIO irqchip into an immutable
>> > irqchip, a bit different from the standard template due
>> > to being hierarchical.
>> >
>> > Tested on the IXP4xx which uses drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
>> > for a rootfs on compact flash with IRQs from this GPIO
>> > block to the CF ATA controller.
>> >
>> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
>> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>>
>> Why? The required dependencies are only in 5,19, and are
>> definitely NOT a stable candidate...
>>
>> This isn't a fix by any stretch of the imagination.
>>
>
>Hi Marc,
>
>While I didn't mark it for stable (and it shouldn't go into any branch
>earlier than 5.19.x), I did send the patches making the irqchips
>immutable to Linus Torvalds as fixes as they technically do *fix* the
>warning emitted by gpiolib and make the implementation correct.
>
>I think these patches should still be part of the v5.19.x stable branch.

Yes, and as far as I see we are taking those fixes too.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha