[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzDoj5E/WsswW0OH@thelio-3990X>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:47:27 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Compiler Attributes: Introduce __access_*() function
attribute
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 6:46 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The GCC docs say it is 'access', instead of '__access__'. I assume it is
> > probably okay so:
>
> Yeah, attributes can be used either with or without double
> underscores, see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html#Attribute-Syntax.
Aha, I figured I was missing something. That is what I get for doing a
mobile review :)
> In this file, we always use the underscore ones to minimize the chance
> of collisions, since the idea is that the rest of the kernel uses the
> shorthands provided here.
That certainly makes sense, I think it is a little easier to read too,
as it gives the attribute name a little separating from '__attribute__'
and any arguments to it.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists