[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtLwCiJeVO1UeJSU5iTrz9MmX3VWZZVFZxFPeSyGWT98g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:12:29 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 00000010 - PC is at mempool_alloc
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 00:15, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:11:42PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > [Please ignore this email if it is already reported]
> > Following kernel crash noticed on qemu-arm with linked config [1] running the
> > Linux next-20220916 to next-20220921.
>
> Does this mean the test passed with next-20220916 and failed with
> next-20220921?
I mean to say like this,
GOOD: next-20220914
BAD: next-20220916
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists