lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220926100809.547576832@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:10:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 066/207] KVM: x86: Inject #UD on emulated XSETBV if XSAVES isnt enabled

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

commit 50b2d49bafa16e6311ab2da82f5aafc5f9ada99b upstream.

Inject #UD when emulating XSETBV if CR4.OSXSAVE is not set.  This also
covers the "XSAVE not supported" check, as setting CR4.OSXSAVE=1 #GPs if
XSAVE is not supported (and userspace gets to keep the pieces if it
forces incoherent vCPU state).

Add a comment to kvm_emulate_xsetbv() to call out that the CPU checks
CR4.OSXSAVE before checking for intercepts.  AMD'S APM implies that #UD
has priority (says that intercepts are checked before #GP exceptions),
while Intel's SDM says nothing about interception priority.  However,
testing on hardware shows that both AMD and Intel CPUs prioritize the #UD
over interception.

Fixes: 02d4160fbd76 ("x86: KVM: add xsetbv to the emulator")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20220824033057.3576315-4-seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |    3 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     |    1 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -4134,6 +4134,9 @@ static int em_xsetbv(struct x86_emulate_
 {
 	u32 eax, ecx, edx;
 
+	if (!(ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
+		return emulate_ud(ctxt);
+
 	eax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
 	edx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
 	ecx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu
 
 int kvm_emulate_xsetbv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	/* Note, #UD due to CR4.OSXSAVE=0 has priority over the intercept. */
 	if (static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) != 0 ||
 	    __kvm_set_xcr(vcpu, kvm_rcx_read(vcpu), kvm_read_edx_eax(vcpu))) {
 		kvm_inject_gp(vcpu, 0);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ