[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220926100809.645226980@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:10:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 068/207] arm64: topology: fix possible overflow in amu_fie_setup()
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
commit d4955c0ad77dbc684fc716387070ac24801b8bca upstream.
cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq() returns max frequency in kHz as *unsigned int*,
while freq_inv_set_max_ratio() gets passed this frequency in Hz as 'u64'.
Multiplying max frequency by 1000 can potentially result in overflow --
multiplying by 1000ULL instead should avoid that...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.
Fixes: cd0ed03a8903 ("arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/01493d64-2bce-d968-86dc-11a122a9c07d@omp.ru
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void amu_fie_setup(const struct c
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
if (!freq_counters_valid(cpu) ||
freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu,
- cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) * 1000,
+ cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) * 1000ULL,
arch_timer_get_rate()))
return;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists