[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprom=CfxPQke5JjZi0CSSvvB=cw1RxOO8StLThpASG3ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:16:18 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 12:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2022 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Compatibles can come in two formats. Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
> > "vendor,soc-ip". Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
> > DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
> > compatibles, except few existing patterns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
>
> Guys,
>
> This is waiting for two months. If you do not like it, please respond
> with some comments.
I'd say, this is good, it documents what was agreed before.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists