[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220926115621.13849-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:56:21 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com
Cc: chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: use update_mmu_tlb() on the second thread
As message in commit 7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB
if PTE entry exists") said, we should update local TLB only on the
second thread. So in the do_anonymous_page() here, we should use
update_mmu_tlb() instead of update_mmu_cache() on the second thread.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220924053239.91661-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
Changelog in v1 -> v2:
- change the subject and commit message (David)
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 118e5f023597..9e11c783ba0e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4122,7 +4122,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
&vmf->ptl);
if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) {
- update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
+ update_mmu_tlb(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
goto release;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists