| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54917c40-dc1c-2d8d-c468-7614fccc6f81@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:39:10 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Cc: yangyicong@...ilicon.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers/perf: add DesignWare PCIe PMU driver
在 2022/9/24 PM4:00, Yicong Yang 写道:
> On 2022/9/23 23:43, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/9/23 AM11:30, Yicong Yang 写道:
>>> On 2022/9/17 20:10, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>>> This commit adds the PCIe Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) driver support
>>>> for T-Head Yitian SoC chip. Yitian is based on the Synopsys PCI Express
>>>> Core controller IP which provides statistics feature. The PMU is not a PCIe
>>>> Root Complex integrated End Point(RCiEP) device but only register counters
>>>> provided by each PCIe Root Port.
>>>>
>>>> To facilitate collection of statistics the controller provides the
>>>> following two features for each Root Port:
>>>>
>>>> - Time Based Analysis (RX/TX data throughput and time spent in each
>>>> low-power LTSSM state)
>>>> - Event counters (Error and Non-Error for lanes)
>>>>
>>>> Note, only one counter for each type.
>>>>
>>>> This driver add PMU devices for each PCIe Root Port. And the PMU device is
>>>> named based the BDF of Root Port. For example,
>>>>
>>>> 10:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1ded:8000 (rev 01)
>>>>
>>>> the PMU device name for this Root Port is pcie_bdf_100000.
>>>>
>>>> Example usage of counting PCIe RX TLP data payload (Units of 16 bytes)::
>>>>
>>>> $# perf stat -a -e pcie_bdf_200/Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload/
>>>>
>>>> average RX bandwidth can be calculated like this:
>>>>
>>>> PCIe TX Bandwidth = PCIE_TX_DATA * 16B / Measure_Time_Window
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/perf/Kconfig | 7 +
>>>> drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 976 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 984 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
>>>> index 1e2d69453771..11ae99de5bbf 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -192,4 +192,11 @@ config MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU
>>>> Enable perf support for Marvell DDR Performance monitoring
>>>> event on CN10K platform.
>>>>
>>>> +config CONFIG_DWC_PCIE_PMU
>>>> + tristate "Enable Synopsys DesignWare PCIe PMU Support"
>>>> + depends on ARM64 || (COMPILE_TEST && 64BIT)
>>>> + help
>>>> + Enable perf support for Synopsys DesignWare PCIe PMU Performance
>>>> + monitoring event on Yitan 710 platform.
>>>> +
>>>> endmenu
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/Makefile b/drivers/perf/Makefile
>>>> index 57a279c61df5..36f75cb0f320 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/perf/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/perf/Makefile
>>>> @@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DMC620_PMU) += arm_dmc620_pmu.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_TAD_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU) += apple_m1_cpu_pmu.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DWC_PCIE_PMU) += dwc_pcie_pmu.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..81e534be13fa
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,976 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Synopsys DesignWare PCIe PMU driver
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2021, 2022 Alibaba Inc.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/smp.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DRV_NAME "dwc_pcie_pmu"
>>>> +#define DEV_NAME "dwc_pcie_pmu"
>>>> +#define RP_NUM_MAX 32 /* 2die * 4RC * 4Ctrol */
>>>> +#define ATTRI_NAME_MAX_SIZE 32
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_VSEC_ID 0x02
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_VSEC_REV 0x04
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_LINK_CAPABILITIES_REG 0xC
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_LANE_SHIFT 4
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_LANE_MASK GENMASK(9, 4)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL 0x8
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_EVENT_SELECT_SHIFT 16
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_EVENT_SELECT_MASK GENMASK(27, 16)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_LANE_SELECT_SHIFT 8
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_LANE_SELECT_MASK GENMASK(11, 8)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_STATUS_SHIFT 7
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_STATUS_MASK BIT(7)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_SHIFT 2
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_MASK GENMASK(4, 2)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_PER_EVENT_OFF (0x1 << DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_SHIFT)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_PER_EVENT_ON (0x3 << DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_SHIFT)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CLEAR_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_DATA 0xC
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_CTRL 0x10
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_REPORT_SELECT_SHIFT 24
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_REPORT_SELECT_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_DURATION_SHIFT 8
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_DURATION_SELECT GENMASK(15, 8)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_MANUAL_CTRL 0x0
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_1MS 0x1
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_10MS 0x2
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_100MS 0x3
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_1S 0x4
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_2S 0x5
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_4S 0x6
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_DURATION_4US 0xff
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_COUNTER_ENABLE 1
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_DATA_REG_LOW 0x14
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_DATA_REG_HIGH 0x18
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Event attributes */
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_EVENTID GENMASK(15, 0)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_TYPE GENMASK(19, 16)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_LANE GENMASK(27, 20)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_ID(event) FIELD_GET(DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_EVENTID, (event)->attr.config)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_TYPE(event) FIELD_GET(DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_TYPE, (event)->attr.config)
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_LANE(event) FIELD_GET(DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_LANE, (event)->attr.config)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_PMU_HAS_REGISTER 1
>>>> +
>>>> +enum dwc_pcie_event_type {
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TYPE_INVALID,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_event_counters {
>>>> + const char name[32];
>>>> + u32 event_id;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_pcie_pmu {
>>>> + struct hlist_node node;
>>>> + unsigned int on_cpu;
>>>> + struct pmu pmu;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_pcie_info_table {
>>>> + u32 bdf;
>>>> + u32 cap_pos;
>>>> + u32 num_lanes;
>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu pcie_pmu;
>>>> + u8 pmu_is_register;
>>>> + struct perf_event *event;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_event_attr *lane_event_attrs;
>>>> + struct attribute **pcie_pmu_event_attrs;
>>>> + struct attribute_group pcie_pmu_event_attrs_group;
>>>> + const struct attribute_group *pcie_pmu_attr_groups[4];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv {
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + u32 pcie_ctrl_num;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_table;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_CREATE_BDF(seg, bus, dev, func) \
>>>> + (((seg) << 24) | (((bus) & 0xFF) << 16) | (((dev) & 0xFF) << 8) | (func))
>>>
>>> Just pass pdev->devfn and use PCI_DEVID() to simplify here.
>>
>> Sorry, as far as I know, PCI_DEVID() output is not exactly the bdf.
>> For example, bdf 300100 is decoded as 3008.
>>
>
> See the standard's encoding of BDF (PCIe Spec 4.0 Figure 6-34: Routing IDs (RIDs) and Supported
> Granularities). Also in uapi/linux/pci.h and include/linux/pci.h. Bus number is encoding in
> BIT[15, 8], slot number in BIT[7, 3] and function number for BIT[2, 0].
Yep, it's right. PCI_SLOT and PCI_FUNC defined in uapi/linux/pci.h follows PCIe Spec
4.0 standard.
>
> You're use your coding of "BDF" here and thought it's more convenient to the user to recognize, but
> that's not what is known of BDF. Just use the standard coding of BDF will have less ambiguous.
My coding of "BDF" is based on the output format of BDF, for example, most of kernel
code split devfn to SLOT and FUNC when print the the pcie address. For example:
// pci_addr_show in drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/sysfs.c
return sprintf(buf, "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x\n",
pci_domain_nr(hdev->pdev->bus),
hdev->pdev->bus->number,
PCI_SLOT(hdev->pdev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(hdev->pdev->devfn));
And the pci address is consistent with lspci output, which is what I intend to do.
Should we rename DWC_PCIE_CREATE_BDF to DWC_PCIE_CREATE_PCI_ADDRESS?
>
>>>
>>>> +#define to_pcie_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct dwc_pcie_pmu, pmu))
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct platform_device *dwc_pcie_pmu_dev;
>>>> +static char *event_attr_name = "events";
>>>> +
>>>> +static ssize_t dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
>>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> + char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu = to_pcie_pmu(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
>>>> +
>>>> + return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, cpumask_of(pcie_pmu->on_cpu));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct device_attribute dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_attr =
>>>> +__ATTR(cpumask, 0444, dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_show, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct attribute *dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_attrs[] = {
>>>> + &dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_attr.attr,
>>>> + NULL
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct attribute_group pcie_pmu_cpumask_attrs_group = {
>>>> + .attrs = dwc_pcie_pmu_cpumask_attrs,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_pcie_format_attr {
>>>> + struct device_attribute attr;
>>>> + u64 field;
>>>> + int config;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static ssize_t dwc_pcie_pmu_format_show(struct device *dev,
>>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> + char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_format_attr *fmt = container_of(attr, typeof(*fmt), attr);
>>>> + int lo = __ffs(fmt->field), hi = __fls(fmt->field);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (lo == hi)
>>>> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "config:%d\n", lo);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!fmt->config)
>>>> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "config:%d-%d\n", lo, hi);
>>>> +
>>>> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "config%d:%d-%d\n", fmt->config, lo,
>>>> + hi);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +#define _dwc_pcie_format_attr(_name, _cfg, _fld) \
>>>> + (&((struct dwc_pcie_format_attr[]) {{ \
>>>> + .attr = __ATTR(_name, 0444, dwc_pcie_pmu_format_show, NULL), \
>>>> + .config = _cfg, \
>>>> + .field = _fld, \
>>>> + }})[0].attr.attr)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define dwc_pcie_format_attr(_name, _fld) _dwc_pcie_format_attr(_name, 0, _fld)
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct attribute *dwc_pcie_format_attrs[] = {
>>>> + dwc_pcie_format_attr(type, DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_TYPE),
>>>> + dwc_pcie_format_attr(eventid, DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_EVENTID),
>>>> + dwc_pcie_format_attr(lane, DWC_PCIE_CONFIG_LANE),
>>>> + NULL,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct attribute_group pcie_pmu_format_attrs_group = {
>>>> + .name = "format",
>>>> + .attrs = dwc_pcie_format_attrs,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct dwc_pcie_event_attr {
>>>> + struct device_attribute attr;
>>>> + enum dwc_pcie_event_type type;
>>>> + u16 eventid;
>>>> + u8 lane;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +ssize_t dwc_pcie_event_show(struct device *dev,
>>>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *page)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_event_attr *eattr;
>>>> +
>>>> + eattr = container_of(attr, typeof(*eattr), attr);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (eattr->type == DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT)
>>>> + return sprintf(page, "eventid=0x%lx, type=0x%lx, lane=0x%lx\n",
>>>> + (unsigned long)eattr->eventid,
>>>> + (unsigned long)eattr->type,
>>>> + (unsigned long)eattr->lane);
>>>> + else
>>>> + return sprintf(page, "eventid=0x%lx, type=0x%lx",
>>>> + (unsigned long)eattr->eventid,
>>>> + (unsigned long)eattr->type);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I remember sysfs_emit() is preferred.
>>
>> You are right, I will use sysfs_emit() in next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_EVENT_ATTR(_name, _type, _eventid, _lane) \
>>>> + (&((struct dwc_pcie_event_attr[]) {{ \
>>>> + .attr = __ATTR(_name, 0444, dwc_pcie_event_show, NULL), \
>>>> + .type = _type, \
>>>> + .eventid = _eventid, \
>>>> + .lane = _lane, \
>>>> + }})[0].attr.attr)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(_name, _eventid) \
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_EVENT_ATTR(_name, DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT, _eventid, 0)
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct attribute *dwc_pcie_pmu_time_event_attrs[] = {
>>>> + /* Group #0 */
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(one_cycle, 0x00),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(TX_L0S, 0x01),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(RX_L0S, 0x02),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L0, 0x03),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L1, 0x04),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L1_1, 0x05),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L1_2, 0x06),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(CFG_RCVRY, 0x07),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(TX_RX_L0S, 0x08),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L1_AUX, 0x09),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(ONE_cycle, 0x10),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(TX_L0S_, 0x11),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(RX_L0S_, 0x12),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L0_, 0x13),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(L1_, 0x17),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(CFG_RCVRY_, 0x17),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(TX_RX_L0S_, 0x18),
>>>> + /* Group #1 */
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(Tx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload, 0x20),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload, 0x21),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(Tx_CCIX_TLP_Data_Payload, 0x22),
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_PMU_BASE_TIME_ATTR(Rx_CCIX_TLP_Data_Payload, 0x23),
>>>> + NULL
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline umode_t pcie_pmu_event_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>>>> + struct attribute *attr,
>>>> + int unuse)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return attr->mode;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline bool pci_dev_is_rootport(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return (pci_is_pcie(pdev) &&
>>>> + pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline unsigned int dwc_pcie_get_bdf(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return (DWC_PCIE_CREATE_BDF(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), dev->bus->number,
>>>> + PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
>>>> + PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn)));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_find_ras_des_cap_position(struct pci_dev *pdev, int *pos)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 header;
>>>> + int vsec = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + while ((vsec = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pdev, vsec,
>>>> + PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VNDR))) {
>>>> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + PCI_VNDR_HEADER, &header);
>>>> + /* Is the device part of a DesignWare Cores PCIe Controller ? */
>>>> + if (PCI_VNDR_HEADER_ID(header) == DWC_PCIE_VSEC_ID &&
>>>> + PCI_VNDR_HEADER_REV(header) == DWC_PCIE_VSEC_REV) {
>>>> + *pos = vsec;
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_discover(struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv *priv)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int val, where, index = 0;
>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info;
>>>> +
>>>> + priv->pcie_table =
>>>> + devm_kcalloc(priv->dev, RP_NUM_MAX, sizeof(*pcie_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!priv->pcie_table)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info = priv->pcie_table;
>>>> + while ((pdev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pdev)) != NULL &&
>>>
>>> I may miss but I don't pci_dev_put() to balance the reference cnt.
>>
>> As the comments in pci_get_device, the reference count is incremented and
>> decremented in the loop automatically. So we do not need to use
>> pci_dev_put(), right?
>>
>> Iterates through the list of known PCI devices. If a PCI device is
>> found with a matching @vendor and @device, *the reference count to the
>> device is incremented* and a pointer to its device structure is returned.
>> Otherwise, %NULL is returned. A new search is initiated by passing %NULL
>> as the @from argument. Otherwise if @from is not %NULL, searches continue
>> from next device on the global list. *The reference count for @from is
>> always decremented if it is not %NULL.*
>
> Thanks for the explanation. The usage is right here. Can we use for_each_pci_dev() instead?
Yes, for_each_pci_dev is more easier. But as we discussed with Jonathan:
> This having a driver than then walks the pci topology to find root ports and add
> extra stuff to them is not a clean solution.
Do we have any plan to extend PCI core interface?
> And any reason to limit the Root Ports number to RP_NUM_MAX? Shouldn't we find all the
> Root Ports with PMU counters and make use of them? Limit it with RP_NUM_MAX is rather
> platform specific and you need to extend it if we have more Root Ports someday.
No. I'm sorry I didn't consider other platforms when developing. I will extend to
discover root device at probing.
>
> Another problem I see here is that you walk all the Root Ports with counters and register
> a PMU for them. But you don't know whether they're removed later when you use them...
>
>>>
>>>> + index < RP_NUM_MAX) {
>>>> + if (!pci_dev_is_rootport(pdev))
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info[index].bdf = dwc_pcie_get_bdf(pdev);
>>>> + pcie_info[index].pdev = pdev;
>
> ...you store the *pdev and use them directly in the pmu_ops but when the device is hot removed
> you'll access an invalid address and crash.
>
> A possible solution is to be notified when the corresponding device is removed/added and handle
> correctly. Or you can get the reference count of the device to prevent it from being removed, but
> this may not be a good option.
I see your point. I will try to add a notifier in hot remove and plugin path.
>
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dwc_pcie_find_ras_des_cap_position(pdev, &where))
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info[index].cap_pos = where;
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
>>>> + pdev->pcie_cap + DWC_PCIE_LINK_CAPABILITIES_REG,
>>>> + &val);
>>>> + pcie_info[index].num_lanes =
>>>> + (val & DWC_PCIE_LANE_MASK) >> DWC_PCIE_LANE_SHIFT;
>>>> + index++;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!index)
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + priv->pcie_ctrl_num = index;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline int dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info,
>>>> + u32 reg, u32 *val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return pci_read_config_dword(pcie_info->pdev, pcie_info->cap_pos + reg,
>>>> + val);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline int dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(struct dwc_pcie_info_table
>>>> + *pcie_info, u32 reg, u32 val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return pci_write_config_dword(pcie_info->pdev, pcie_info->cap_pos + reg,
>>>> + val);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_set_event_id(struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info,
>>>> + int event_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_MASK;
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__CNT_EVENT_SELECT_MASK;
>>>> + val |= event_id << DWC_PCIE__CNT_EVENT_SELECT_SHIFT;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_write_event_lane(struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info,
>>>> + int lane, int event_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__CNT_LANE_SELECT_MASK;
>>>> + val |= lane << DWC_PCIE__CNT_LANE_SELECT_SHIFT;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_event_enable(struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info,
>>>> + u32 enable)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>
>>> Somebody may mentioned. Maybe you don't need to print these messages in PMU ops, just
>>> return the correct error code and let perf handle it. Or you should provide more
>>> information for these, like failed in which funcion or read/write which value.
>>> If it only necessary when debugging, make it pci_dbg().
>>
>> Yep, you are right, I will drop the print info in next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val &= ~(DWC_PCIE__CNT_ENABLE_MASK);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (enable)
>>>> + val |= DWC_PCIE_PER_EVENT_ON;
>>>> + else
>>>> + val |= DWC_PCIE_PER_EVENT_OFF;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_enable(struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info,
>>>> + u32 enable)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (enable)
>>>> + val |= DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_COUNTER_ENABLE;
>>>> + else
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_COUNTER_ENABLE;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_read_event_counter(struct dwc_pcie_info_table
>>>> + *pcie_info, u64 *counter)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret, val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_DATA, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + *counter = val;
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_read_base_time_counter(struct dwc_pcie_info_table
>>>> + *pcie_info, u64 *counter)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret, val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_DATA_REG_HIGH,
>>>> + &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + *counter = val;
>>>> + *counter <<= 32;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_DATA_REG_LOW,
>>>> + &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + *counter += val;
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_clear_event_counter(struct dwc_pcie_info_table
>>>> + *pcie_info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CLEAR_MASK;
>>>> + val |= 1;
>>>
>>> It's better to use a macro for '1' to make it more clear.
>>
>> Good idea, will fix it in next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info, DWC_PCIE_EVENT_CNT_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_add_prepare(struct dwc_pcie_info_table
>>>> + *pcie_info, u32 event_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 ret;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_read_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_CTRL, &val);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe read fail\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_REPORT_SELECT_MASK;
>>>> + val |= event_id << DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_REPORT_SELECT_SHIFT;
>>>> + val &= ~DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_DURATION_SELECT;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_DATA_REG is a 64 bit register, we can safely
>>>> + * use it with any manually controllered duration.
>>>> + */
>>>> + val &= ~(DWC_PCIE__TIME_BASED_DURATION_SELECT);
>>>> + val |= DWC_PCIE_DURATION_MANUAL_CTRL;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_write_dword(pcie_info,
>>>> + DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASED_ANALYSIS_CTRL, val);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PCIe write fail\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pmu_to_pcie_info(struct pmu *pmu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu = to_pcie_pmu(pmu);
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info = container_of(pcie_pmu, struct dwc_pcie_info_table, pcie_pmu);
>>>> + if (pcie_info == NULL)
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Can't get pcie info\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return pcie_info;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u64 counter;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info = pmu_to_pcie_info(event->pmu);
>>>> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>>> + enum dwc_pcie_event_type type = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_TYPE(event);
>>>> + u64 delta, prev, now;
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + prev = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (type == DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_read_event_counter(pcie_info, &counter);
>>>> + else if (type == DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_read_base_time_counter(pcie_info,
>>>> + &counter);
>>>> + else
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Input param is invalid\n");
>>>> +
>>>
>>> For the messages in PMU ops, you should print the message on behalf of PMU device
>>> rather than PCIe device. Same for the other places.
>>
>> Good idea, will fix it in next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> + now = counter;
>>>> + } while (local64_cmpxchg(&hwc->prev_count, prev, now) != prev);
>>>> +
>>>> + delta = now - prev;
>>>> +
>>>> + local64_add(delta, &event->count);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu = to_pcie_pmu(event->pmu);
>>>> + struct perf_event *sibling;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
>>>> + return -ENOENT;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (hwc->sample_period) {
>>>> + dev_dbg(pcie_pmu->dev, "Sampling not supported\n");
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (event->cpu < 0) {
>>>> + dev_dbg(pcie_pmu->dev, "Per-task mode not supported\n");
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + event->cpu = pcie_pmu->on_cpu;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (event->group_leader != event &&
>>>> + !is_software_event(event->group_leader)) {
>>>> + dev_dbg(pcie_pmu->dev, "Drive way only allow one event!\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event->group_leader) {
>>>> + if (sibling != event && !is_software_event(sibling)) {
>>>> + dev_dbg(pcie_pmu->dev, "Drive way event not allowed!\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + hwc->idx = -1;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_set_period(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u64 new = 0;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> redundant 'new'.
>>>
>>>> + local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, new);
>>>> +}
>>
>> Yep, will fix it in next version.
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info = pmu_to_pcie_info(event->pmu);
>>>> + enum dwc_pcie_event_type type = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_TYPE(event);
>>>> +
>>>> + hwc->state = 0;
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_set_period(hwc);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (type == DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_enable(pcie_info, 1);
>>>> + else if (type == DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_enable(pcie_info, 1);
>>>> + else
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Input param is invalid\n");
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info = pmu_to_pcie_info(event->pmu);
>>>> + enum dwc_pcie_event_type type = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_TYPE(event);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (event->hw.state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (type == DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_enable(pcie_info, 0);
>>>> + else if (type == DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_enable(pcie_info, 0);
>>>> + else
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Input param is invalid\n");
>>>
>>> If the message is necessary, it'll be more helpful to mention which param
>>> is invalid.
>>
>> I see, will give more hint in log.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_update(event);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info = pmu_to_pcie_info(event->pmu);
>>>> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>>> + enum dwc_pcie_event_type type = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_TYPE(event);
>>>> + int event_id = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_ID(event);
>>>> + int lane = DWC_PCIE_EVENT_LANE(event);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pcie_info->event)
>>>> + return -ENOSPC;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->event = event;
>>>> +
>>>> + hwc->state = PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (type == DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT) {
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_enable(pcie_info, 0);
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_write_event_lane(pcie_info, lane, event_id);
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_set_event_id(pcie_info, event_id);
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_clear_event_counter(pcie_info);
>>>> + } else if (type == DWC_PCIE_TIME_BASE_EVENT) {
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_enable(pcie_info, 0);
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_base_time_add_prepare(pcie_info, event_id);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Input param is invalid\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
>>>> +
>>>> + perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info = pmu_to_pcie_info(event->pmu);
>>>> +
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_stop(event, flags | PERF_EF_UPDATE);
>>>> + perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>>>> + pcie_info->event = NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void dwc_pcie_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
>>>> +{
>>>> + dwc_pcie_pmu_event_update(event);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct dwc_event_counters event_array[] = {
>>>> + {"tx_ack_dllp", 0x600},
>>>> + {"tx_update_fc_dllp", 0x601},
>>>> + {"rx_ack_dllp", 0x602},
>>>> + {"rx_update_fc_dllp", 0x603},
>>>> + {"rx_nulified_tlp", 0x604},
>>>> + {"tx_nulified_tlp", 0x605},
>>>> + {"rx_duplicate_tlp", 0x606},
>>>> + {"tx_memory_write", 0x700},
>>>> + {"tx_memory_read", 0x701},
>>>> + {"tx_configuration_write", 0x702},
>>>> + {"tx_configuration_read", 0x703},
>>>> + {"tx_io_write", 0x704},
>>>> + {"tx_io_read", 0x705},
>>>> + {"tx_completion_without_data", 0x706},
>>>> + {"tx_completion_with_data", 0x707},
>>>> + {"tx_message_tlp", 0x708},
>>>> + {"tx_atomic", 0x709},
>>>> + {"tx_tlp_with_prefix", 0x70A},
>>>> + {"rx_memory_write", 0x70B},
>>>> + {"rx_memory_read", 0x70C},
>>>> + {"rx_io_write", 0x70F},
>>>> + {"rx_io_read", 0x710},
>>>> + {"rx_completion_without_data", 0x711},
>>>> + {"rx_completion_with_data", 0x712},
>>>> + {"rx_message_tlp", 0x713},
>>>> + {"rx_atomic", 0x714},
>>>> + {"rx_tlp_with_prefix", 0x715},
>>>> + {"tx_ccix_tlp", 0x716},
>>>> + {"rx_ccix_tlp", 0x717},
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_attr_init(struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv *priv,
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i, j;
>>>> + char lane[8];
>>>> + const char tmp[64];
>>>> + int events_per_lane;
>>>> + int num_lane_events;
>>>> + int time_base_count;
>>>> + int num_attrs, attr_idx;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_event_attr *lane_attrs;
>>>> + struct attribute **pmu_attrs;
>>>> +
>>>> + memset((void *)tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
>>>> + memset((void *)lane, 0, sizeof(lane));
>>>> + time_base_count = ARRAY_SIZE(dwc_pcie_pmu_time_event_attrs);
>>>> + events_per_lane = ARRAY_SIZE(event_array);
>>>> + num_lane_events = pcie_info->num_lanes * events_per_lane;
>>>> + num_attrs = time_base_count + num_lane_events;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->lane_event_attrs =
>>>> + devm_kcalloc(priv->dev, num_lane_events,
>>>> + sizeof(struct dwc_pcie_event_attr),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!pcie_info->lane_event_attrs)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + lane_attrs = pcie_info->lane_event_attrs;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs =
>>>> + devm_kcalloc(priv->dev, num_attrs, sizeof(struct attribute *),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + pmu_attrs = pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_lane_events; i++) {
>>>> + lane_attrs[i].attr.attr.name =
>>>> + devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, sizeof(char)
>>>> + * ATTRI_NAME_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!lane_attrs[i].attr.attr.name)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + attr_idx = 0;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < pcie_info->num_lanes; i++) {
>>>> + sprintf(lane, "_lane%d", i);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (j = 0; j < events_per_lane; j++) {
>>>> + int pos = i * events_per_lane + j;
>>>> +
>>>> + strcat((char *)tmp, event_array[j].name);
>>>> + strcat((char *)tmp, lane);
>>>> + memcpy((void *)lane_attrs[pos].attr.attr.name,
>>>> + (void *)tmp,
>>>> + sizeof(tmp));
>>>> +
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].attr.attr.mode =
>>>> + VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(0444);
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].attr.show = dwc_pcie_event_show;
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].attr.store = NULL;
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].type = DWC_PCIE_LANE_EVENT;
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].eventid = event_array[j].event_id;
>>>> + lane_attrs[pos].lane = i;
>>>> + pmu_attrs[attr_idx++] = &lane_attrs[pos].attr.attr;
>>>> +
>>>> + memset((void *)tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dwc_pcie_pmu_time_event_attrs); i++)
>>>> + pmu_attrs[attr_idx++] = dwc_pcie_pmu_time_event_attrs[i];
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs[attr_idx++] = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs_group.name = event_attr_name;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs_group.is_visible =
>>>> + pcie_pmu_event_attr_is_visible;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs_group.attrs =
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs;
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_attr_groups[0] =
>>>> + &pcie_info->pcie_pmu_event_attrs_group;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_attr_groups[1] = &pcie_pmu_format_attrs_group;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_attr_groups[2] = &pcie_pmu_cpumask_attrs_group;
>>>> + pcie_info->pcie_pmu_attr_groups[3] = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int __dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv *priv,
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_info_table *pcie_info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + char *name;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!pcie_info || !pcie_info->pdev) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Input parameter is invalid\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_pmu = &pcie_info->pcie_pmu;
>>>> + dev = &pcie_info->pdev->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = dwc_pcie_pmu_attr_init(priv, pcie_info);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "PMU attr init fail ret=%d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_pmu->dev = dev;
>>>> + pcie_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
>>>> + .module = THIS_MODULE,
>>>> + .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
>>>> + .pmu_enable = NULL,
>>>> + .pmu_disable = NULL,
>>>> + .event_init = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_init,
>>>> + .add = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_add,
>>>> + .del = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_del,
>>>> + .start = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_start,
>>>> + .stop = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_stop,
>>>> + .read = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_read,
>>>> + .attr_groups = pcie_info->pcie_pmu_attr_groups,
>>>> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + name = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "pcie_bdf_%x",
>>>> + pcie_info->bdf);
>>>> + if (!name)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Pick one CPU to be the preferred one to use */
>>>> + pcie_pmu->on_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>>>> +
>>>
>>> So we'll probabley bind all the pmus on one single CPU, is it intended? Since it's
>>> an uncore PMU, we can make it run on any cpu (or for locality CPU on the controller's
>>> NUMA node).
>>>
>>> And I didn't see you register a hotplug handler, so what if the ->on_cpu is hot removed?
>>
>> This PMU does not support interrupt at all, so we do not need to bind it to CPU.
>> Should we remove this line?
>>
>
> No it's still needed to provide it and export it through the cpumask sysfs attribute, otherwise
> the perf cannot recognize it as an uncore PMU device. See [*]. It can be a single CPU mask and
> the event will start only on the given CPU. Or make it a range of CPUs but only let one CPU really
> start the event. It may still need to handle the case that the CPU start the event is offline,
> even without interrupt.
Thank you for the explanation.
>
> BTW, since it doesn't support interrupt, can counters overflow and how to handle the overflow case?
The counter is 64 bit so that we can saftly use it and do not need to handle overflow.
>
> [*] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.0-rc1/tools/perf/util/pmu.c#L615
>
>>>
>>>> + ret = perf_pmu_register(&pcie_pmu->pmu, name, -1);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pci_err(pcie_info->pdev, "Error %d registering PMU @%x\n", ret,
>>>> + pcie_info->bdf);
>>>
>>> will be more helpful to print the bdf as format <bus>:<dev>:<func>.
>>
>> Good idea, will fix in next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + pcie_info->pmu_is_register = DWC_PCIE_PMU_HAS_REGISTER;
>>>
>>> Make @pmu_is_register a boolean will be more clear.
>>
>> @pmu_is_register is also discussed in Jonathan' reply. Jonathan suggests to
>> remove it, so let discuss if to keep this field first :) If we decide to keep
>> it, I will let it be boolean.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> + int index;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
>>>
>>> Make the long line first when declaring.
>>
>> Agree, will change the code style.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + for (index = 0; index < priv->pcie_ctrl_num; index++)
>>>> + if (priv->pcie_table[index].pmu_is_register) {
>>>> + pcie_pmu = &priv->pcie_table[index].pcie_pmu;
>>>> + perf_pmu_unregister(&pcie_pmu->pmu);
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> + int pcie_index;
>>>> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu_priv *priv;
>>>> +
>>>> + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!priv)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* If PMU is not support on current platform, keep slient */
>>>> + if (dwc_pcie_pmu_discover(priv))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (pcie_index = 0; pcie_index < priv->pcie_ctrl_num; pcie_index++) {
>>>> + struct pci_dev *rp = priv->pcie_table[pcie_index].pdev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = __dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(priv, &priv->pcie_table[pcie_index]);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(&rp->dev, "PCIe PMU probe fail\n");
>>>> + goto pmu_unregister;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PCIe PMUs registered\n");
>>>> +
>>>
>>> As Jonathan mentioned this message maybe unnecessary, but I may find it useful if you
>>> print how many PMU's registered.
>>
>> Fine, I can add a count here.
>>
>>>
>>> On one PMU registration failed, you just remove all the PMUs registered. I wonder if
>>> it's better to make already registered PMU stay instead of removing them all.
>>
>> If perf_pmu_register fails, is it necessary to call perf_pmu_unregister? I did not find
>> similar implementation to unregister pmu when perf_pmu_register fails.
>>
>
> No need for this but that's not what I mean here. If there should be M PMUs but only N of them
> are probed successfully, maybe no need to fail the probe and remove them all. We still can
> use them but just notify the user that how many PMUs are registered and the rest fail.
> Anyway it's up to you.
I see your point, I will try to leave the PMUs which are probed successfully.
Thank you for your valuable comments.
Best Regards,
Shuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists