[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca8efe3b-1aeb-8a4e-79e9-3f3f9281ff34@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:46:09 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 04/30] video: fbdev: skeletonfb: Fix syntax errors in
comments
On 9/26/22 17:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2022-09-26 12:11:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> From: Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit fc378794a2f7a19cf26010dc33b89ba608d4c70f ]
>>
>> Delete the redundant word 'its'.
>
> This does not belong in stable.
>
Without seeing the upstream commit, the patch subject is misleading:
the patch doesn't fix any syntax errors as one might get from the
compiler.
Also, what I find irritating is that I have never seen reply from
@cdjrlc.com people to review comments pointing flaws of their patch.
I guess they don't have any other jobs here in LKML other than just
throwing one-line redundant word stripping patches. The similar cause
is why Jani Nikula [1] and Greg NAKed cgel.zte patches (ignoring
reviews and "atypical" corporate email structure [2])
Hence NAK (agree with your verdict). However, should the upstream
commit be reverted?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/878rn1dd8l.fsf@intel.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yylv5hbSBejJ58nt@kroah.com/
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists