lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220926100933.4532f987@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:09:33 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, william.kucharski@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: align the comm length with TASK_COMM_LEN

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:51:05 +0800
Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com> wrote:

> __string could get a dst string with length less than
> TASK_COMM_LEN.
> 
> A task->comm may change that can cause out of bounds access
> for the dst string buffer, e.g in the call trace of below:
> 
> Call trace:
> 
>     dump_backtrace.cfi_jt+0x0/0x4
>     show_stack+0x14/0x1c
>     dump_stack+0xa0/0xd8
>     die_callback+0x248/0x24c
>     notify_die+0x7c/0xf8
>     die+0xac/0x290
>     die_kernel_fault+0x88/0x98
>     die_kernel_fault+0x0/0x98
>     do_page_fault+0xa0/0x544
>     do_mem_abort+0x60/0x10c
>     el1_da+0x1c/0xc4

>     trace_event_raw_event_cgroup_migrate+0x124/0x170

You're sure the above is on the strcpy()?

Note, this code has __string() which does a strlen() which appears to be
working fine.

>     cgroup_attach_task+0x2e8/0x41c
>     __cgroup1_procs_write+0x114/0x1ec
>     cgroup1_tasks_write+0x10/0x18
>     cgroup_file_write+0xa4/0x208
>     kernfs_fop_write+0x1f0/0x2f4
>     __vfs_write+0x5c/0x200
>     vfs_write+0xe0/0x1a0
>     ksys_write+0x74/0xdc
>     __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
>     el0_svc_common+0xc0/0x1a4
>     el0_svc_compat_handler+0x18/0x20
>     el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x2c

Can you give the full debug report, that includes the register content and
everything else.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ