[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174f5998-1f1d-c283-26bb-82c5a68150ab@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:48:27 +0800
From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@...wei.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"Sidhartha Kumar" <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@...hat.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault
On 2022/9/26 2:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:49:05 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling
>> userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but
>> reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following
>> race,
>>
>> hugetlb_fault
>> hugetlb_no_page
>> /*unlock vma_lock */
>> hugetlb_handle_userfault
>> handle_userfault
>> /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/
>> vm_mmap_pgoff
>> do_mmap
>> mmap_region
>> munmap_vma_range
>> /* clean old vma */
>> /* lock vma_lock again <--- UAF */
>> /* unlock vma_lock */
>>
>> Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(),
>> let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix
>> the issue.
>>
> Thanks. Turns out that porting all the pending material on top of this
> change was not a confidence-inspiring activity. So I ended up merging
> your v3. Please work with Greg on the backporting when he gets on to
> it? Hopefully that will merely involve sending him this v4.
OK, I'll do it.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists