[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WOTBvBKh2LqX08pBh2HyJ_ORbLyuwcy5zFOwzUYqFYHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:54:19 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Sean Hong <sean.hong@...nta.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Add INX N116BCA-EA2
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 7:39 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:08 AM Sean Hong
> <sean.hong@...nta.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for the INX - N116BCA-EA2 (HW: C1) panel
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Hong <sean.hong@...nta.corp-partner.google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > index 060f4f98bc04..ba75fae7d376 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > @@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] = {
> > EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0a5d, &delay_200_500_e50, "NV116WHM-N45"),
> >
> > EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('C', 'M', 'N', 0x114c, &innolux_n116bca_ea1.delay, "N116BCA-EA1"),
> > + EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('C', 'M', 'N', 0x1154, &delay_200_500_p2e80, "N116BCA-EA2"),
> > EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('C', 'M', 'N', 0x1247, &delay_200_500_e80_d50, "N120ACA-EA1"),
>
> This patch doesn't apply cleanly. You should be posting it against the
> top of drm-misc-next to make it easy to apply.
>
> In this case the merge conflict was trivial so I've fixed it and pushed it but:
> * Other folks applying patches won't do this.
> * If a patch is more complicated, I won't do this either.
>
> In any case, this is now in drm-misc-next as:
>
> c7bcc1056cff drm/panel-edp: Add INX N116BCA-EA2
Actually, though I've applied this change, while I was picking things
to the downstream ChromeOS tree I was reminded about a patch that
Chen-Yu landed recently:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220908085454.1024167-1-wenst@chromium.org
I suspect that the two Innolux panels that you added recently need the
same treatment. Can you please post a patch for that? Said another
way: I think all of the Innolux panels that are using
"delay_200_500_p2e80" should switch to "delay_200_500_e80_d50"
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists