[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2647127.mvXUDI8C0e@g550jk>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:57:58 +0200
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom-pma8084: fix vadc channel node names
Hi Neil,
On Montag, 26. September 2022 10:27:54 CEST Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 25/09/2022 22:21, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Node names for the channel are supposed to be adc-chan@....
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi index e77602e9f95c..7ad573c7b4ac
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
> > @@ -64,22 +64,27 @@ pma8084_vadc: adc@...0 {
> >
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> >
> > - die_temp {
> > + adc-chan@8 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_DIE_TEMP>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > - ref_625mv {
> > +
> > + adc-chan@9 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_REF_625MV>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > - ref_1250v {
> > +
> > + adc-chan@10 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_REF_1250MV>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > - ref_buf_625mv {
> > +
> > + adc-chan@12 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_SPARE1>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > - ref_gnd {
> > +
> > + adc-chan@14 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_GND_REF>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > - ref_vdd {
> > +
> > + adc-chan@15 {
> >
> > reg = <VADC_VDD_VADC>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > };
>
> I don't see where this is required, bindings doesn't mandate this naming:
>
> patternProperties:
>
> "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
They don't require the "adc-chan" part (although dt nodes are supposed to have
common names and adc-chan is used for adc for that; and dt node names are not
supposed to have underscores), but this validation error happens without this
commit:
<snip>/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084-ifc6540.dtb: pma8084@0: adc@...0:
'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
'#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'die_temp', 'ref_1250v', 'ref_625mv',
'ref_buf_625mv', 'ref_gnd', 'ref_vdd' do not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
'die_temp', 'ref_1250v', 'ref_625mv', 'ref_buf_625mv', 'ref_gnd',
'ref_vdd' do not match any of the regexes: '^.*@[0-9a-f]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
'qcom,spmi-iadc' was expected
From schema: <snip>/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-
pmic.yaml
So while e.g. ref-vdd@15 would also work, adc-chan@15 is more correct.
Regards
Luca
> Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists