[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220926124651.5d35dd5f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:46:51 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/syscalls: allow tracing of __do_sys_[syscall]
functions
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:52:13 -0700
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -152,8 +152,12 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> * externally visible function. This makes extern inline behave as per gnu89
> * semantics rather than c99. This prevents multiple symbol definition errors
> * of extern inline functions at link time.
> - * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing.
> + *
> + * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing. If the
> + * function is known to be safe for tracing, inline_trace can be used. Otherwise
> + * inline would prevent tracing.
Perhaps add:
* Don't complain if this function is not available to trace!
;-)
-- Steve
> */
> +#define inline_trace __inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused
> #define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused notrace
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists