lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2098a505-3668-30cb-e3b6-2111a703b27e@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:30:07 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Dylan Yudaken <dylany@...com>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: register single issuer task at creation

On 9/26/22 11:09 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> Registering the single issuer task from the first submit adds unnecesary
> complications to the API as well as the implementation. Where simply
> registering it at creation should not impose any barriers to getting the
> same performance wins. The only catch is users that might want to move the
> ring after creation but before submission. For these users allow them to
> create the ring with IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED and then enable it on the
> submission task.
> 
> There is another problem in 6.1, with IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN. That
> would like to check the submitter_task from unlocked contexts, which would
> be racy. If upfront the submitter_task is set at creation time it will
> simplify the logic there and probably increase performance (though this is
> unmeasured).
> 
> Patch 1 registers the task at creation of the io_uring, this works
> standalone in case you want to only merge this part for 6.0
> 
> Patch 2/3 cleans up the code from the old style

Thanks, I like 1/3 a lot better now. Will provide applications with an
easy path to use SINGLE_ISSUER, even if they currently setup the ring
from a different thread/task than they end up using it from.

I've updated the 6.0 and 6.1 repos to reflect this.

-- 
Jens Axboe


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ