[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzHqNiRj2Q5vxdCV@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:06:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: bigeasy@...utronix.de, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
tj@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, will@...nel.org,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@...ux.ibm.com>,
Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:49:16PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> #define ___wait_is_interruptible(state) \
> (!__builtin_constant_p(state) || \
> state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE || state == TASK_KILLABLE) \
>
> That would not trigger when state is also TASK_FREEZABLE, no?
Spot on!
signal_pending_state() writes that as:
state & (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_WAKEKILL)
which is the correct form.
diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 14ad8a0e9fac..7f5a51aae0a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_pollfree(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head)
#define ___wait_is_interruptible(state) \
(!__builtin_constant_p(state) || \
- state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE || state == TASK_KILLABLE) \
+ (state & (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_WAKEKILL)))
extern void init_wait_entry(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, int flags);
Let me go git-grep some to see if there's more similar fail.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists