[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202209261123.B2CBAE87E0@keescook>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:24:37 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
x86@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] mempool: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match
ksize() usage
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:50:43PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/23/22 22:28, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Round up allocations with kmalloc_size_roundup() so that mempool's use
> > of ksize() is always accurate and no special handling of the memory is
> > needed by KASAN, UBSAN_BOUNDS, nor FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > mm/mempool.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
> > index 96488b13a1ef..0f3107b28e6b 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempool.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempool.c
> > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mempool_free_slab);
> > */
> > void *mempool_kmalloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *pool_data)
> > {
> > - size_t size = (size_t)pool_data;
> > + size_t size = kmalloc_size_roundup((size_t)pool_data);
>
> Hm it is kinda wasteful to call into kmalloc_size_roundup for every
> allocation that has the same input. We could do it just once in
> mempool_init_node() for adjusting pool->pool_data ?
>
> But looking more closely, I wonder why poison_element() and
> kasan_unpoison_element() in mm/mempool.c even have to use ksize()/__ksize()
> and not just operate on the requested size (again, pool->pool_data). If no
> kmalloc mempool's users use ksize() to write beyond requested size, then we
> don't have to unpoison/poison that area either?
Yeah, I think that's a fair point. I will adjust this.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists