[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220926205333.qlhb5ojmx4sktzt5@mobilestation>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:53:33 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
William McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/20] PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe controller support
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:49:24PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > @Christoph, @Marek, @Bjorn, @Rob could you please join to the
> > DMA-mask related discussion. @Lorenzo can't decide which driver should
> > initialize the device DMA-mask.
>
> The driver that does the actual DMA mapping or allocation functions
> need to set it. But even with your comments on the questions I'm
> still confused what struct device you are even talking about. Can
> you explain this a bit better?
We are talking about the DW PCIe Root Port controller with DW eDMA engine
embedded. It' simplified structure can be represented as follows:
+---------------+ +--------+
| System memory | | CPU(s) |
+---------------+ +--------+
^ | | ^
| ... System bus ... |
... | | ...
| v v |
+------------+------+--------+----------+------+
| DW PCIe RP | AXI-m| | AXI-s/DBI| |
| +------+ +----------+ |
| ^ ^ | |
| +------+----+ | CSRs |
| v v v |
| +-------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
| | eDMA | | in-iATU | | out-iATU | |
| +-------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
| ^ ^ ^ |
| +--------+--+---+-------+ |
+------------------| PIPE |--------------------+
+------+
| ^
v |
PCIe bus
The DW PCIe controller device is instantiated as a platform device
defined in the system DT source file. The device is probed by the
DW PCIe low-level driver, which after the platform-specific setups
initiates the generic DW PCIe host-controller registration. On the way
of that procedure the DW PCIe core tries to auto-detect the DW eDMA
engine availability. If the engine is found, the DW eDMA probe method
is called in order to register the DMA-engine device. After that the
PCIe host bridge is registered. Both the PCIe host-bridge and
DMA-engine devices will have the DW PCIe platform device as parent.
Getting back to the sketch above. Here is a short description of the
content:
1. DW eDMA is capable of performing the data transfers from/to System
memory to/from PCIe bus memory.
2. in-iATU is the Inbound Address Translation Unit, which is
responsible for the PCIe bus peripheral devices to access the system
memory. The "dma-ranges" DT-property is used to initialize the
PCIe<->Sys memory mapping. (@William note the In-iATU setup doesn't
affect the eDMA transfers.)
3. out-iATU is responsible for the CPU(s) to access the PCIe bus
peripheral devices memory/cfg-space.
So eDMA and in-iATU are using the same AXI-master interface to access
the system memory. Thus the DMAable memory capability is the same for
both of them (Though in-iATU may have some specific mapping based on
the "dma-ranges" DT-property setup). Neither DW eDMA nor DW PCIe Root
Port CSRs region have any register to auto-detect the AXI-m interface
address bus width. It's selected during the IP-core synthesize and is
platform-specific. The question is: "What driver/code is supposed to
set the DMA-mask of the DW PCIe platform device?" Seeing the parental
platform device is used to perform the memory-mapping for both DW eDMA
clients and PCIe-bus peripheral device drivers, and seeing the AXI-m
interface parameters aren't auto-detectable and are platform-specific,
the only place it should be done in is the DW PCIe low-level device
driver. I don't really see any alternative... What is your opinion?
-Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists