[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGtprH8SVWQM=NpNaQtDsg7d=xuQJS-JRzw9KZ0XvV8KdRCkow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:35:54 -0700
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Cc: x86 <x86@...nel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, peterx@...hat.com,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 7/8] Kvm: selftests: x86: Execute cpu specific vmcall instruction
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:43 PM David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:04:47AM +0000, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> > Update the vmcall instruction invocation to happen according to the cpu
> > type.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 8 ++++++++
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c | 2 +-
> > .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c | 2 +-
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c | 2 +-
>
> What's the reason to use kvm_hypercall() for these tests? All of these
> are Intel-specific. i.e. is_amd_cpu() will always return false.
>
That's right. This change is attempting to have hypercalls from guest
code done via a common API as far as possible.
> > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> > ...
> > --
> > 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists