linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pwm: lpss: Use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:51:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pwm: lpss: Use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() and
 pm_ptr() macros

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:56:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Using these new macros allows the compiler to remove the unused dev_pm_ops
> > structure and related functions if !CONFIG_PM without the need to mark
> > the functions __maybe_unused.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> that was one of the patches I thought I already acked. I didn't check if
> I'm confused or if you missed to add my Ack.

If so, sorry, and I think it might be because of wrong branch I took or misuse
of `git filter-branch --msg-filter`... But looking into [1] I do not see your
replies.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/20220906195735.87361-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/

> Doesn't really matter to
> me. So:
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko