[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166418635574.3586576.7130049081458859826.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:59:39 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] KVM: arm64: Ignore kvm-arm.mode if !is_hyp_mode_available()
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:06:58 -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Ignore kvm-arm.mode if !is_hyp_mode_available(). Specifically, we want
> to avoid switching kvm_mode to KVM_MODE_PROTECTED if hypervisor mode is
> not available. This prevents "Protected KVM" cpu capability being
> reported when Linux is booting in EL1 and would not have KVM enabled.
> Reasonably though, we should warn if the command line is requesting a
> KVM mode at all if KVM isn't actually available. Allow
> "kvm-arm.mode=none" to skip the warning since this would disable KVM
> anyway.
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: arm64: Ignore kvm-arm.mode if !is_hyp_mode_available()
commit: b2a4d007c347b4cb4c60f7512733c3f8300a129c
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists