lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qnsaUq4PvXM-BW63B=gvgzR3gV6zszEy2VFgzCx=B=wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:06:07 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] m68k: process bootinfo records before saving them

Hi Geert,

On 9/26/22, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:03 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>> The RNG seed boot record is memzeroed after processing, in order to
>> preserve forward secrecy. By saving the bootinfo for procfs prior to
>> that, forward secrecy is violated, since it becomes possible to recover
>> past states. So, save the bootinfo block only after first processing
>> them.
>>
>> Fixes: a1ee38ab1a75 ("m68k: virt: Use RNG seed from bootinfo block")
>> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Thanks for the review.

Did you intend to take these 3 patches through your m68k tree, or did
you want me to take them for some reason instead?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ