lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:11:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 051/148] mm: slub: fix flush_cpu_slab()/__free_slab() invocations in task context.

From: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>

commit e45cc288724f0cfd497bb5920bcfa60caa335729 upstream.

Commit 5a836bf6b09f ("mm: slub: move flush_cpu_slab() invocations
__free_slab() invocations out of IRQ context") moved all flush_cpu_slab()
invocations to the global workqueue to avoid a problem related
with deactivate_slab()/__free_slab() being called from an IRQ context
on PREEMPT_RT kernels.

When the flush_all_cpu_locked() function is called from a task context
it may happen that a workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM bit set ends up
flushing the global workqueue, this will cause a dependency issue.

 workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM nvme-delete-wq:nvme_delete_ctrl_work [nvme_core]
   is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:flush_cpu_slab
 WARNING: CPU: 37 PID: 410 at kernel/workqueue.c:2637
   check_flush_dependency+0x10a/0x120
 Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work [nvme_core]
 RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10a/0x120[  453.262125] Call Trace:
 __flush_work.isra.0+0xbf/0x220
 ? __queue_work+0x1dc/0x420
 flush_all_cpus_locked+0xfb/0x120
 __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x2b/0x320
 kmem_cache_destroy+0x49/0x100
 bioset_exit+0x143/0x190
 blk_release_queue+0xb9/0x100
 kobject_cleanup+0x37/0x130
 nvme_fc_ctrl_free+0xc6/0x150 [nvme_fc]
 nvme_free_ctrl+0x1ac/0x2b0 [nvme_core]

Fix this bug by creating a workqueue for the flush operation with
the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM bit set.

Fixes: 5a836bf6b09f ("mm: slub: move flush_cpu_slab() invocations __free_slab() invocations out of IRQ context")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 mm/slub.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -308,6 +308,11 @@ static inline void stat(const struct kme
  */
 static nodemask_t slab_nodes;
 
+/*
+ * Workqueue used for flush_cpu_slab().
+ */
+static struct workqueue_struct *flushwq;
+
 /********************************************************************
  * 			Core slab cache functions
  *******************************************************************/
@@ -2688,7 +2693,7 @@ static void flush_all_cpus_locked(struct
 		INIT_WORK(&sfw->work, flush_cpu_slab);
 		sfw->skip = false;
 		sfw->s = s;
-		schedule_work_on(cpu, &sfw->work);
+		queue_work_on(cpu, flushwq, &sfw->work);
 	}
 
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -4850,6 +4855,8 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
 
 void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
 {
+	flushwq = alloc_workqueue("slub_flushwq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	WARN_ON(!flushwq);
 }
 
 struct kmem_cache *


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ