[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220927153338.4177854-1-me@inclyc.cn>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:33:38 +0800
From: YingChi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
To: me@...lyc.cn
Cc: bp@...en8.de, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: use _Alignof to avoid UB in TYPE_ALIGN
WG14 N2350 made very clear that it is an UB having type definitions with
in "offsetof". This patch change the implementation of macro
"TYPE_ALIGN" to builtin "_Alignof" to avoid undefined behavior.
I've grepped all source files to find any type definitions within
"offsetof".
offsetof\(struct .*\{ .*,
This implementation of macro "TYPE_ALIGN" seemes to be the only case of
type definitions within offsetof in the kernel codebase.
I've made a clang patch that rejects any definitions within
__builtin_offsetof (usually #defined with "offsetof"), and tested
compiling with this patch, there is no error if this patch is applied.
In PATCH v1 "TYPE_ALIGN" was substituted with "__alignof__" which is a
GCC extension, which returns the *preferred alignment*, that is
different from C11 "_Alignof" returning *ABI alignment*. For example, on
i386 __alignof__(long long) evaluates to 8 but _Alignof(long long)
evaluates to 4. See godbolt links below.
In this patch, I'd like to use "__alignof__" to "_Alignof" to preserve
the behavior here.
Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
Link: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/13xTYYd11
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/T749MfM9o
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Alignment.html
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574
---
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
index 621f4b6cac4a..de96c11e1fe9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
@@ -133,9 +133,6 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
fpu__init_system_mxcsr();
}
-/* Get alignment of the TYPE. */
-#define TYPE_ALIGN(TYPE) offsetof(struct { char x; TYPE test; }, test)
-
/*
* Enforce that 'MEMBER' is the last field of 'TYPE'.
*
@@ -143,8 +140,8 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
* because that's how C aligns structs.
*/
#define CHECK_MEMBER_AT_END_OF(TYPE, MEMBER) \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(TYPE) != ALIGN(offsetofend(TYPE, MEMBER), \
- TYPE_ALIGN(TYPE)))
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(TYPE) != \
+ ALIGN(offsetofend(TYPE, MEMBER), _Alignof(TYPE)))
/*
* We append the 'struct fpu' to the task_struct:
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists