lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzM0Z4gXsjZTDkX0@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:35:35 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with modprobe

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:11:24PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The driver for the Realtek RTL8821CE network card show some asymmetrical
> behavior between loading and unloading.
> 
> Starting from scratch, a load command provides the expected results:
> 
> finger@...alhost:~/rtw88>sudo modprobe -v rtw88_8821ce
> insmod /lib/modules/6.1.0-rc3-wireless-next-00623-g2bc09edc7fa2-dirty/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_core.ko
> 
> insmod /lib/modules/6.1.0-rc3-wireless-next-00623-g2bc09edc7fa2-dirty/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_pci.ko
> 
> insmod /lib/modules/6.1.0-rc3-wireless-next-00623-g2bc09edc7fa2-dirty/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821c.ko
> 
> insmod /lib/modules/6.1.0-rc3-wireless-next-00623-g2bc09edc7fa2-dirty/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821ce.ko
> 
> Unloading produces a different result:
> 
> finger@...alhost:~/rtw88>sudo modprobe -rv rtw88_8821ce
> rmmod rtw88_8821ce
> rmmod rtw88_pci
> rmmod rtw88_8821c
> 
> Note that rtw88_core is still loaded and needs to be unloaded separately:
> 
> finger@...alhost:~/rtw88>sudo modprobe -rv rtw88_core
> rmmod rtw88_core
> 
> The appropriate lines from modules.dep reformatted for clarity are as follows:
> 
> kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_core.ko:
>    kernel/net/mac80211/mac80211.ko
>    kernel/lib/crypto/libarc4.ko
>    kernel/net/wireless/cfg80211.ko
> kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821c.ko:
>    kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_core.ko
>    kernel/net/mac80211/mac80211.ko
>    kernel/lib/crypto/libarc4.ko
>    kernel/net/wireless/cfg80211.ko
> kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821ce.ko:
>    kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821c.ko
>    kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_pci.ko
>    kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_core.ko
>    kernel/net/mac80211/mac80211.ko
>    kernel/lib/crypto/libarc4.ko
>    kernel/net/wireless/cfg80211.ko
> kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_pci.ko:
>    kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_core.ko
>    kernel/net/mac80211/mac80211.ko
>    kernel/lib/crypto/libarc4.ko
>    kernel/net/wireless/cfg80211.ko
> 
> What is the explanation for the failure to auto-unload rtw88_core?

I don't think we ever auto-unload dependant modules as we don't know if
they are still in use or not (hint, module references is not a
representation if the module is in use or not.)

So this is working as intended, right?  And how it's always worked?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ