linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 00/10] RFC on synpsys pwm driver changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e37c7dd-a445-522c-be57-7ad571b456e1@sifive.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:43:30 +0100
From:   Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        William Salmon <william.salmon@...ive.com>,
        Jude Onyenegecha <jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/10] RFC on synpsys pwm driver changes

On 27/09/2022 17:47, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Ben,
> 
> there was some feedback to individual patches that require a rework. I'm
> marking the whole series as "changes requested" in the expectation that
> you will resend them all once you addressed the feedback.

I have most of the feedback done but we've not had a chance to test them
fully. I can send a new series later today but the changes for the clock
division calculations have yet to be tested.

-- 
Ben