[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220927231824.209460321@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:15:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ring-buffer: Check pending waiters when doing wake ups as well
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The wake up waiters only checks the "wakeup_full" variable and not the
"full_waiters_pending". The full_waiters_pending is set when a waiter is
added to the wait queue. The wakeup_full is only set when an event is
triggered, and it clears the full_waiters_pending to avoid multiple calls
to irq_work_queue().
The irq_work callback really needs to check both wakeup_full as well as
full_waiters_pending such that this code can be used to wake up waiters
when a file is closed that represents the ring buffer and the waiters need
to be woken up.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 15693458c4bc0 ("tracing/ring-buffer: Move poll wake ups into ring buffer code")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 02db92c9eb1b..5a7d818ca3ea 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -917,8 +917,9 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work)
struct rb_irq_work *rbwork = container_of(work, struct rb_irq_work, work);
wake_up_all(&rbwork->waiters);
- if (rbwork->wakeup_full) {
+ if (rbwork->full_waiters_pending || rbwork->wakeup_full) {
rbwork->wakeup_full = false;
+ rbwork->full_waiters_pending = false;
wake_up_all(&rbwork->full_waiters);
}
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists