[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07014070-5186-ca95-7028-82f77612dedd@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:35:42 +0200
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] kvm_main.c: handle atomic memslot update
Am 27/09/2022 um 09:46 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
> On 09.09.22 12:45, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> When kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region_list() is invoked, we need
>> to make sure that all memslots are updated in the inactive list
>> and then swap (preferreably only once) the lists, so that all
>> changes are visible immediately.
>>
>> The only issue is that DELETE and MOVE need to perform 2 swaps:
>> firstly replace old memslot with invalid, and then remove invalid.
>>
>
> I'm curious, how would a resize (grow/shrink) or a split be handled?
>
There are only 4 operations possible in KVM: KVM_MR_{DELETE, MOVE,
CREATE, FLAGS_ONLY}.
A resize should be implemented in QEMU as DELETE+CREATE.
Therefore a resize on memslot X will be implemented as:
First pass on the userspace operations:
invalidate memslot X;
swap_memslot_list(); // NOW it is visible to the guest
What guest sees: memslot X is invalid, so MMU keeps retrying the page fault
Second pass:
create new memslot X
delete old memslot X
What guest sees: memslot X is invalid, so MMU keeps retrying the page fault
Third pass:
swap() // 1 for each address space affected
What guest sees: new memslot replacing the old one
A split is DELETE+CREATE+CREATE, so it's the same:
First pass on the userspace operations:
invalidate memslot X;
swap_memslot_list(); // NOW it is visible to the guest
What guest sees: memslot X is invalid, so MMU keeps retrying the page fault
Second pass:
delete old memslot X
create new memslot X1
create new memslot X2
What guest sees: memslot X is invalid, so MMU keeps retrying the page fault
Third pass:
swap() // 1 for each address space affected
What guest sees: two new memslots replacing the old one
Powered by blists - more mailing lists