[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220927113637.GA10468@nam-dell>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:36:37 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: forest@...ttletooquiet.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] staging: vt6655: change vnt_receive_frame return
type to void
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:45:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:29:33PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > -bool vnt_receive_frame(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rx_desc *curr_rd)
> > +void vnt_receive_frame(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rx_desc *curr_rd)
> > {
> > struct vnt_rd_info *rd_info = curr_rd->rd_info;
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > @@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ bool vnt_receive_frame(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rx_desc *curr_rd)
> > /* Frame Size error drop this packet.*/
> > dev_dbg(&priv->pcid->dev, "Wrong frame size %d\n", frame_size);
> > dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
> > - return true;
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > if (vnt_rx_data(priv, skb, frame_size))
> > - return true;
> > + return;
> >
> > dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
> >
> > - return true;
> > + return;
>
> Just delete this last return (it's pointless now).
Will be changed, thanks.
Best regards,
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists