[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc64b69d-3d65-f5ca-a688-2ad1a055ba4b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:28:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 17/17] drm/mediatek: Add mt8195-dpi support to drm_drv
On 27/09/2022 15:04, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 19/09/2022 18:56, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
>>> Add dpi support to enable the HDMI path.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>>> index 72049a530ae1..27f029ca760b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>>> @@ -820,6 +820,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
>>> .data = (void *)MTK_DPI },
>>> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-dpi",
>>> .data = (void *)MTK_DPI },
>>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-dpi",
>>> + .data = (void *)MTK_DPI },
>>
>> It's compatible with the others. You don't need more compatibles.
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> It's a bit confusing, because this compatible is used in both
> mtk_drm_drv.c and in mtk_dpi.c
>
> Albeit it's entirely the same thing regarding the mtk_drm_drv module,
> it's pretty different
> regarding the mtk_dpi module.
Sure, but this does not explain why do you need these entries here in
mtk_drm_drv.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists