[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a5f006d-2735-5af5-48fa-4397bfb5e3ba@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:33:52 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
"Rob Clark" <robdclark@...il.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/msm/dp: drop modeset sanity checks
On 9/28/2022 5:24 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:42:53AM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> On 9/27/2022 12:14 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:17:20AM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/2022 1:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>>> Drop the overly defensive modeset sanity checks of function parameters
>>>>> which have already been checked or used by the callers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>>>>
>>>> The change LGTM, hence
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> I think we can use below fixes tag so that we can pick up this entire
>>>> series for the fixes cycle.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: c943b4948b58 ("drm/msm/dp: add displayPort driver support")
>>>
>>> Perhaps that's a requirement for drm, but I wouldn't add a Fixes tag for
>>> this otherwise as it's not a bug.
>>>
>>> You also have to watch out for Sasha and his autosel scripts which will
>>> probably try to backport this to stable if it finds a Fixes tag.
>
>> Discussed with Rob on IRC, we will apply everything except the last two
>> patches of this series in the -fixes and take these two for the next
>> kernel rev push.
>
> So the fixes go in 6.0 and the two follow-on cleanups in 6.1? Or did you
> mean 6.1 and 6.2?
>
> Johan
The fixes will go in 6.1 first.
The two follow-on cleanups in 6.2.
Thanks
Abhinav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists