linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/13] phy: qcom-qmp-pcie: unify sdm845 registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4148c7f-3f75-bedd-3e3e-a50113cf41b8@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:01:40 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] phy: qcom-qmp-pcie: unify sdm845 registers

On 28/09/2022 17:28, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The SDM845 register array is identical to pciephy_regs_layout so drop
> the former.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c | 8 +-------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
> index 7b3f7e42edd5..4146545fdf5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
> @@ -92,12 +92,6 @@ static const unsigned int pciephy_regs_layout[QPHY_LAYOUT_SIZE] = {
>   	[QPHY_PCS_STATUS]		= 0x174,
>   };
>   
> -static const unsigned int sdm845_qmp_pciephy_regs_layout[QPHY_LAYOUT_SIZE] = {
> -	[QPHY_SW_RESET]			= 0x00,
> -	[QPHY_START_CTRL]		= 0x08,
> -	[QPHY_PCS_STATUS]		= 0x174,
> -};
> -
>   static const unsigned int sdm845_qhp_pciephy_regs_layout[QPHY_LAYOUT_SIZE] = {
>   	[QPHY_SW_RESET]			= 0x00,
>   	[QPHY_START_CTRL]		= 0x08,
> @@ -1545,7 +1539,7 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sdm845_qmp_pciephy_cfg = {
>   	.num_resets		= ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_pciephy_reset_l),
>   	.vreg_list		= qmp_phy_vreg_l,
>   	.num_vregs		= ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> -	.regs			= sdm845_qmp_pciephy_regs_layout,
> +	.regs			= pciephy_regs_layout,
>   
>   	.start_ctrl		= PCS_START | SERDES_START,
>   	.pwrdn_ctrl		= SW_PWRDN | REFCLK_DRV_DSBL,

Isn't is an issue if QPHY_COM_* entries are in pciephy_regs_layout and not in sdm845_qmp_pciephy_regs_layout ?

BTW it seems those QPHY_COM_* are never used..

Neil