linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 097/120] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YzR0wGFicmfmCKOs@sashalap>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:22:24 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 097/120] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:40:02AM -0400, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Greg,
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:12:10 -0400,
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 94e9bc73d85aa6ecfe249e985ff57abe0ab35f34 ]
>> >
>> > This turns the IXP4xx GPIO irqchip into an immutable
>> > irqchip, a bit different from the standard template due
>> > to being hierarchical.
>> >
>> > Tested on the IXP4xx which uses drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
>> > for a rootfs on compact flash with IRQs from this GPIO
>> > block to the CF ATA controller.
>> >
>> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
>> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>>
>> We had that discussion[1], and concluded that none of these should be
>> backported to a kernel earlier than 5.19. 5.4 doesn't currently
>> contain the relevant infrastructure, nor should that infrastructure
>> should be backported either.
>>
>> Can we *please* stop this?
>>
>> 	M.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMRc=Md9JKdW8wmbun_0_1y2RQbck7q=vzOkdw6n+FBgpf0h8w@mail.gmail.com/
>
>Sasha, what went wrong here?
>
>Now dropped from all but 5.19.y, thanks.

Sorry about that, I misunderstood Bartosz's reply and went off based on
that.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha