lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72m+3gfo=L4T7WY5MeSxZckQKeV+kVdvRhEAVtxcz9cC7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:39:57 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:32 PM Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I do wonder how many more things you will need to list here. As far as
> I can tell there is also other avx512* flags for the x86_64 target.

Yeah, there are a lot of target features, but they are not getting enabled.

Eventually, a stable target spec alternative (e.g. all relevant target
feature flags) should be available, and then we can know what the
guaranteed behavior will be and thus decide better which flags to keep
or not depending on how explicit we want to be with respect to that.

For the moment I went for consistency with the line above, since that
was enough to disable everything we needed, though as you may have
noticed, 3dnow and mmx are not there, because I had to move them back
to the target spec [1].

[1] https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/commit/c5eae3a6e69c63dc8d69f51f74f74b853831ec71

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ