lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:40:15 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] riscv: consolidate ret_from_kernel_thread into
 ret_from_fork

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:55:27AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:14 AM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 07:25:30AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:03 AM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The ret_from_kernel_thread() behaves similarly with ret_from_fork(),
> > > > the only difference is whether call the fn(arg) or not, this can be
> > > > acchieved by testing fn is NULL or not, I.E s0 is 0 or not.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S   | 11 +++--------
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c |  5 ++---
> > > >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > index 2207cf44a3bc..a3e1ed2fa2ac 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > @@ -323,20 +323,15 @@ END(handle_kernel_stack_overflow)
> > > >
> > > >  ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> > > >         call schedule_tail
> > > > -       move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> > > > -       la ra, ret_from_exception
> > > > -       tail syscall_exit_to_user_mode
> > > > -ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
> > > > -
> > > > -ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> > > > -       call schedule_tail
> > > > +       beqz s0, 1f     /* not from kernel thread */
> >
> > Hi Guo,
> >
> > > We can't use s0 as condition for ret_from_fork/ret_from_kernel_thread.
> > > The s0=0 is also okay for ret_from_fork.
> >
> > IIUC, in ret_from_fork, the s0 comes p->thread.s[0] rather than s0 in
> > pt_regs.
> Yes, you are correct.
> 
> >
> > >
> > >         /* p->thread holds context to be restored by __switch_to() */
> > >         if (unlikely(args->fn)) {
> > >                 /* Kernel thread */
> > >                 memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > >                 childregs->gp = gp_in_global;
> > >                 /* Supervisor/Machine, irqs on: */
> > >                 childregs->status = SR_PP | SR_PIE;
> > >
> > >                 p->thread.ra = (unsigned long)ret_from_kernel_thread;
> > >                 p->thread.s[0] = (unsigned long)args->fn;
> > >                 p->thread.s[1] = (unsigned long)args->fn_arg;
> > >         } else {
> > >                 *childregs = *(current_pt_regs());
> > >                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Oh, I'm wrong, It's switch_to_restore -> exception_restore.
> 
> > >                 if (usp) /* User fork */
> > >                         childregs->sp = usp;
> > >                 if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
> > >                         childregs->tp = tls;
> > >                 childregs->a0 = 0; /* Return value of fork() */
> > >                 p->thread.ra = (unsigned long)ret_from_fork;
> > >         }
> > >         p->thread.sp = (unsigned long)childregs; /* kernel sp */
> > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > @@ -182,8 +180,9 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> > > >                 if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
> > > >                         childregs->tp = tls;
> > > >                 childregs->a0 = 0; /* Return value of fork() */
> > > > -               p->thread.ra = (unsigned long)ret_from_fork;
> > > > +               p->thread.s[0] = 0;
> >
> > Here we assign 0 to p->thread.s[0]
> I missed that.
> 
> Merge thread & fork is not a good idea, and using fp as the flag is so implicit.
> 
> ➜  linux git:(rv64sv32) grep ret_from_fork arch -r | grep entry.S
> arch/arc/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/arc/kernel/entry.S:END(ret_from_fork)
> arch/csky/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c: * the task-switch, and shows up in
> ret_from_fork in entry.S,
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:      .globl  ret_from_fork
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:      .ent    ret_from_fork
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:ret_from_fork:
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:.end ret_from_fork
> arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork)
> arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork)
> arch/hexagon/kernel/vm_entry.S: .globl ret_from_fork
> arch/hexagon/kernel/vm_entry.S:ret_from_fork:
> arch/microblaze/kernel/entry.S:   (copy_thread makes ret_from_fork the
> return address in each new thread's
> arch/microblaze/kernel/entry.S:C_ENTRY(ret_from_fork):
> arch/m68k/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork)
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork)
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:NOKPROBE(ret_from_fork)
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S:ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
> arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:# a new process exits the kernel with ret_from_fork
> arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:       brasl   %r14,__ret_from_fork
> arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
> arch/mips/kernel/entry.S:FEXPORT(ret_from_fork)
> arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S:   /* All syscalls return here... just
> pay attention to ret_from_fork
> arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S:    * that may be either schedule(),
> ret_from_fork(), or
> arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/xtensa/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> arch/xtensa/kernel/entry.S:ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
> arch/sparc/kernel/entry.S:      .globl  ret_from_fork
> arch/sparc/kernel/entry.S:ret_from_fork:
> ➜  linux git:(rv64sv32) grep ret_from_kernel_thread arch -r | grep entry.S
> arch/csky/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:      .globl  ret_from_kernel_thread
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:      .ent    ret_from_kernel_thread
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:ret_from_kernel_thread:
> arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S:.end ret_from_kernel_thread
> arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S:END(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S:SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/microblaze/kernel/entry.S:C_ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread):
> arch/m68k/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S:ENDPROC(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/mips/kernel/entry.S:FEXPORT(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S:    * ret_from_kernel_thread().  If we
> are returning to a new thread,
> arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/xtensa/kernel/entry.S:ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/xtensa/kernel/entry.S:ENDPROC(ret_from_kernel_thread)
> arch/sparc/kernel/entry.S:      .globl  ret_from_kernel_thread
> arch/sparc/kernel/entry.S:ret_from_kernel_thread:
> 
> Many architectures use a similar style. If you want to continue the
> patch, I think you should first rename ret_from_fork properly, and
> give an explicit flag definition, not just setting fp = 0.
> 

Above list also shows many architectures don't have a
ret_from_kernel_thread, I think the reason is simple it behaves
similarly as ret_from_fork.
As for flag, IMHO, we may missed something as clearing the s[12]
array in thread_struct when user fork, because s[12] may contain
random kernel memory content, which may be finally leaked to
userspace. This is a security hole.

A trivial patch of memset(0) can fix it, after this fix, checking the
s[0] is straightforward.

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
index 67e7cd123ceb..50a0f7e4327c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
                p->thread.s[0] = (unsigned long)args->fn;
                p->thread.s[1] = (unsigned long)args->fn_arg;
        } else {
+               memset(&p->thread.s, 0, sizeof(p->thread.s));
                *childregs = *(current_pt_regs());
                if (usp) /* User fork */
                        childregs->sp = usp;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists