linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update audio tuner settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <166438601946.235698.6774354071024623483.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:26:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update audio tuner settings

On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:11:41 +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Audio tuner is used to handle clock drift between 26M and APLL domain.
> 
> It's expected when abs(chg_cnt) equals to upper bound, tuner updates pcw
> setting automatically, and then abs(chg_cnt) decreases.
> In the stress test, we found abs(chg_cnt) possibly equals to 2 at the
> unexpected timing. This results in wrong pcw updating.
> Finally, abs(chg_cnt) will always be larger than upper bound,
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update audio tuner settings
      commit: 7ba6546b547c75b0196029c7e0aaaab2eb6694a4

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark