[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202209281102.A86D736@keescook>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:06:07 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, matthew.auld@...el.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, jani.nikula@...el.com,
nirmoy.das@...el.com, airlied@...hat.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
vitor@...saru.org, dlatypov@...gle.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
trix@...hat.com, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/9] drm/i915: Check for integer truncation on
scatterlist creation
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:09:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Kees, you need to reign in the craziness in overflow.h.
Understood. I've been trying to help the drm folks walk a line between
having a bunch of custom macros hidden away in the drm includes and
building up generalized versions that are actually helpful beyond drm.
But I can see that it doesn't help to have a "do two things at the same
time" macro for the assignment checking.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists