linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] virtio_pci: avoid to request intx irq if irq is zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 04:46:01 +0000
From:   Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:     "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] virtio_pci: avoid to request intx irq if irq is zero



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:03 PM
> To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Cc: jasowang@...hat.com; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_pci: avoid to request intx irq if irq is zero
> 
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:57:06AM +0800, Angus Chen wrote:
> > The background is that we use dpu in cloud computing,the arch is x86,80
> > cores.We will have a lots of virtio devices,like 512 or more.
> > When we probe about 200 virtio_blk devices,it will fail and
> > the stack is print as follows:
> >
> > [25338.485128] virtio-pci 0000:b3:00.0: virtio_pci: leaving for legacy driver
> > [25338.496174] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (virtio418) vs.
> 00015a00 (timer)
> > [25338.503822] CPU: 20 PID: 5431 Comm: kworker/20:0 Kdump: loaded
> Tainted: G           OE    --------- -  - 4.18.0-305.30.1.el8.x86_64
> > [25338.516403] Hardware name: Inspur NF5280M5/YZMB-00882-10E, BIOS
> 4.1.21 08/25/2021
> > [25338.523881] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
> > [25338.528235] Call Trace:
> > [25338.530687]  dump_stack+0x5c/0x80
> > [25338.534000]  __setup_irq.cold.53+0x7c/0xd3
> > [25338.538098]  request_threaded_irq+0xf5/0x160
> > [25338.542371]  vp_find_vqs+0xc7/0x190
> > [25338.545866]  init_vq+0x17c/0x2e0 [virtio_blk]
> > [25338.550223]  ? ncpus_cmp_func+0x10/0x10
> > [25338.554061]  virtblk_probe+0xe6/0x8a0 [virtio_blk]
> > [25338.558846]  virtio_dev_probe+0x158/0x1f0
> > [25338.562861]  really_probe+0x255/0x4a0
> > [25338.566524]  ? __driver_attach_async_helper+0x90/0x90
> > [25338.571567]  driver_probe_device+0x49/0xc0
> > [25338.575660]  bus_for_each_drv+0x79/0xc0
> > [25338.579499]  __device_attach+0xdc/0x160
> > [25338.583337]  bus_probe_device+0x9d/0xb0
> > [25338.587167]  device_add+0x418/0x780
> > [25338.590654]  register_virtio_device+0x9e/0xe0
> > [25338.595011]  virtio_pci_probe+0xb3/0x140
> > [25338.598941]  local_pci_probe+0x41/0x90
> > [25338.602689]  work_for_cpu_fn+0x16/0x20
> > [25338.606443]  process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
> > [25338.610456]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > [25338.614381]  worker_thread+0x1cf/0x390
> > [25338.618132]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > [25338.622051]  kthread+0x116/0x130
> > [25338.625283]  ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
> > [25338.629731]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> > [25338.633395] virtio_blk: probe of virtio418 failed with error -16
> >
> > The log :
> > "genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (virtio418) vs. 00015a00 (timer)"
> > was print because of the irq 0 is used by timer exclusive,and when
> > vp_find_vqs call vp_find_vqs_msix and return false twice for
> > whatever reason,then it will call vp_find_vqs_intx for the last try.
> > Because vp_dev->pci_dev->irq is zero,so it will be request irq 0 with
> > flag IRQF_SHARED,we will get a backtrace like above.
> >
> > When the pci device is vf,the intx
> > is not allowed and it will be 0.Even if the pci device is a pf,
> > we should remind that
> > irq 0 is almost be reserved or used for some device fixed
> 
> 
> Where does it say irq 0 is reserved on all platforms?
> I am not sure this is right.
> 
> 
> > like timer in x86 without IRQF_SHARED,so we can avoid call it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > index ad258a9d3b9f..3208a2b149b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > @@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static int vp_find_vqs_intx(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> unsigned int nvqs,
> >  	struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
> >  	int i, err, queue_idx = 0;
> >
> > +	if (vp_dev->pci_dev->irq == 0)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> 
> 
> Pls read the PCI spec:
> 
> Interrupt Pin
> The Interrupt Pin register tells which interrupt pin the device (or device function)
> uses. A
> value of 1 corresponds to INTA#. A value of 2 corresponds to INTB#. A value of 3
> corresponds to INTC#. A value of 4 corresponds to INTD#. Devices (or device
> functions)
> that do not use an interrupt pin must put a 0 in this register.
> 
> 
> Please check vp_dev->pci_dev->pin accordingly.
Ok,I will send this for next version.thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >  	vp_dev->vqs = kcalloc(nvqs, sizeof(*vp_dev->vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!vp_dev->vqs)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > --
> > 2.17.1