linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: Add support for modular builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:16:33 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: Add support for modular builds

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:47:20AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Allow the Qualcomm PCIe controller driver to be built as a module, which
> > > is useful for multi-platform kernels as well as during development.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes in v2
> > >  - rebase on next-20220720 (adjust context)
> > >  - add Rob and Mani's reviewed-by tags
> > 
> > Have you had a change to look at this one since you got back from
> > vacation?
> > 
> > I believe this should be uncontroversial as we already have other
> > modular dwc drivers and there's no mapping of legacy INTx interrupts
> > involved.
> 
> Sincere apologies for the delay.
> 
> I am afraid it does look controversial - I need some time to go through
> the full discussion and make up my mind, unfortunately we are late in
> the cycle and I am dealing with the patch backlog, I believe this may
> end up being a discussion targeting the v6.2 merge window I am afraid.

No worries. Thanks for taking a look.

Johan