[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9005bfd1-2812-f4c3-38e2-eb7aa5d61634@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:29:54 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hare@...e.com>, <hch@....de>, <bvanassche@....org>,
<john.garry@...wei.com>, <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] scsi: pm8001: use sas_find_attached_phy_id()
instead of open coded
On 2022/9/28 15:02, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 9/28/22 16:01, Jason Yan wrote:
>> The attached phy id finding is open coded. Now we can replace it with
>> sas_find_attached_phy_id(). To keep consistent, the return value of
>> pm8001_dev_found_notify() is also changed to -ENODEV after calling
>> sas_find_attathed_phy_id() failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Note for future patches: if you change a patch, it needs to be reviewed
> again. So please drop any review tag from the patch commit message to make
> that clear.
OK. Thanks again.
Jason
>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 18 ++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>> index 8e3f2f9ddaac..b4007c4f157d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>> @@ -645,22 +645,16 @@ static int pm8001_dev_found_notify(struct domain_device *dev)
>> pm8001_device->dcompletion = &completion;
>> if (parent_dev && dev_is_expander(parent_dev->dev_type)) {
>> int phy_id;
>> - struct ex_phy *phy;
>> - for (phy_id = 0; phy_id < parent_dev->ex_dev.num_phys;
>> - phy_id++) {
>> - phy = &parent_dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id];
>> - if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)
>> - == SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr)) {
>> - pm8001_device->attached_phy = phy_id;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> - }
>> - if (phy_id == parent_dev->ex_dev.num_phys) {
>> +
>> + phy_id = sas_find_attached_phy_id(&parent_dev->ex_dev, dev);
>> + if (phy_id < 0) {
>> pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, FAIL,
>> "Error: no attached dev:%016llx at ex:%016llx.\n",
>> SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr),
>> SAS_ADDR(parent_dev->sas_addr));
>> - res = -1;
>> + res = phy_id;
>> + } else {
>> + pm8001_device->attached_phy = phy_id;
>> }
>> } else {
>> if (dev->dev_type == SAS_SATA_DEV) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists