linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add pm6125 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220928081055.p66huqct2wnrsrdx@SoMainline.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:10:55 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add pm6125
 compatible

On 2022-09-28 09:35:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/09/2022 21:01, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Document support for the pm6125, typically paired with the sm6125 SoC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/0ec65132-7d7a-2f8d-cc16-cb76efc343d6@linaro.org/

Thanks, I thought of it this morning while browsing lore, but only got
to a screen just now so you beat me to it by ~30 minutes.

No need to lecture me on the rules, but I can't promise this won't
happen again.

- Marijn