linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:21:05 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash
 once the random core is ready.

On 9/28/22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> I could replace "system_unbound_wq" with "system_wq" when
>> pushing. Is anybody against it, please?
>
> so schedule_delayed_work() then?
> I don't mind at all. I used that one just because serialisation is not
> needed and neither is the CPU important.

Indeed, given that this very much is unbound, I think Sebastian's
original patch makes most sense.

Jason