linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in fscache_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD-N9QWpDpP5YGwq363Z1jDOeEK+S1JjNGmiZsD4KimZSkowgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:21:40 +0800
From:   Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+5b129e8586277719bab3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs-bounces@...hat.com,
        linux-cachefs-owner@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nogikh@...gle.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in fscache_free_cookie

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:15 PM syzbot
<syzbot+5b129e8586277719bab3@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> This bug is marked as fixed by commit:
> fscache: fix GPF in fscache_free_cookie
> But I can't find it in any tested tree for more than 90 days.
> Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> Until then the bug is still considered open and
> new crashes with the same signature are ignored.

@Dmitry Vyukov Why syzbot continuously complains about this bug
report? The fix commit looks correct.