[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220927175548.331d9bae@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:55:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/7] net: mdiobus: search for PSE nodes by
parsing PHY nodes.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:24:57 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> +static struct pse_control *
> +fwnode_find_pse_control(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> + struct pse_control *psec;
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + np = to_of_node(fwnode);
> + if (!np)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + psec = of_pse_control_get(np);
This will fail with ENOTSUPP if PSE is not built. Won't that make all
fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() calls fail?
static inline struct pse_control *of_pse_control_get(struct device_node *node)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
}
Actually let me take a closer look at patch 2 :S
> + if (PTR_ERR(psec) == -ENOENT)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return psec;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists