| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87a66jpweq.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:30:18 +1000
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] nouveau/dmem: Refactor nouveau_dmem_fault_copy_one()
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 16:03 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> nouveau_dmem_fault_copy_one() is used during handling of CPU faults via
>> the migrate_to_ram() callback and is used to copy data from GPU to CPU
>> memory. It is currently specific to fault handling, however a future
>> patch implementing eviction of data during teardown needs similar
>> functionality.
>>
>> Refactor out the core functionality so that it is not specific to fault
>> handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 59 +++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> index f9234ed..66ebbd4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> @@ -139,44 +139,25 @@ static void nouveau_dmem_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence **fence)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_fault_copy_one(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>> - struct vm_fault *vmf, struct migrate_vma *args,
>> - dma_addr_t *dma_addr)
>> +static int nouveau_dmem_copy_one(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct page *spage,
>> + struct page *dpage, dma_addr_t *dma_addr)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = drm->dev->dev;
>> - struct page *dpage, *spage;
>> - struct nouveau_svmm *svmm;
>> -
>> - spage = migrate_pfn_to_page(args->src[0]);
>> - if (!spage || !(args->src[0] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE))
>> - return 0;
>>
>> - dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
>> - if (!dpage)
>> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>> lock_page(dpage);
>>
>> *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, dpage, 0, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(dev, *dma_addr))
>> - goto error_free_page;
>> + return -EIO;
>>
>> - svmm = spage->zone_device_data;
>> - mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
>> - nouveau_svmm_invalidate(svmm, args->start, args->end);
>> if (drm->dmem->migrate.copy_func(drm, 1, NOUVEAU_APER_HOST, *dma_addr,
>> - NOUVEAU_APER_VRAM, nouveau_dmem_page_addr(spage)))
>> - goto error_dma_unmap;
>> - mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>> + NOUVEAU_APER_VRAM,
>> + nouveau_dmem_page_addr(spage))) {
>> + dma_unmap_page(dev, *dma_addr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>
> Feel free to just align this with the starting (, as long as it doesn't go
> above 100 characters it doesn't really matter imho and would look nicer that
> way.
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Thanks! I'm not sure I precisely understood your alignment comment above
but feel free to let me know if I got it wrong in v2.
> Will look at the other patch in a moment
>
>>
>> - args->dst[0] = migrate_pfn(page_to_pfn(dpage));
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -error_dma_unmap:
>> - mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>> - dma_unmap_page(dev, *dma_addr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> -error_free_page:
>> - __free_page(dpage);
>> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>> }
>>
>> static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> @@ -184,9 +165,11 @@ static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> struct nouveau_drm *drm = page_to_drm(vmf->page);
>> struct nouveau_dmem *dmem = drm->dmem;
>> struct nouveau_fence *fence;
>> + struct nouveau_svmm *svmm;
>> + struct page *spage, *dpage;
>> unsigned long src = 0, dst = 0;
>> dma_addr_t dma_addr = 0;
>> - vm_fault_t ret;
>> + vm_fault_t ret = 0;
>> struct migrate_vma args = {
>> .vma = vmf->vma,
>> .start = vmf->address,
>> @@ -207,9 +190,25 @@ static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> if (!args.cpages)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - ret = nouveau_dmem_fault_copy_one(drm, vmf, &args, &dma_addr);
>> - if (ret || dst == 0)
>> + spage = migrate_pfn_to_page(src);
>> + if (!spage || !(src & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE))
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
>> + if (!dpage)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + dst = migrate_pfn(page_to_pfn(dpage));
>> +
>> + svmm = spage->zone_device_data;
>> + mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
>> + nouveau_svmm_invalidate(svmm, args.start, args.end);
>> + ret = nouveau_dmem_copy_one(drm, spage, dpage, &dma_addr);
>> + mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>> goto done;
>> + }
>>
>> nouveau_fence_new(dmem->migrate.chan, false, &fence);
>> migrate_vma_pages(&args);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists