[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzQ+m3jjh6tOyXmS@orome>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:31:23 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pwm: sysfs: Return directly from the for-loop in
PM callbacks
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:07:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is no need to assign ret to 0 and then break the loop just
> for returning the error to the caller. Instead, return directly
> from the for-loop, and 0 otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> v2: added tag (Uwe)
> drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I fail to see how this is an improvement. The outcome is exactly the
same and this doesn't even make the code shorter. Why bother?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists