[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220928014750.17054-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:47:50 +0800
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
CC: <bear.wang@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<fparent@...libre.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<macpaul@...il.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195-demo: fix the memory size of
>On 9/26/22 15:05, Miles Chen wrote:
>> Hi Macpaul,
>>
>>> The size of device tree node secmon (bl31_secmon_reserved) was
>>> incorrect. It should be increased to 2MiB (0x200000).
>>
>> 192K should work when the patch(6147314aeedc) was accepted.
>> Does the trusted-firmware-a get larger now, so we need to
>> increase the size to 2MiB?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Miles
>
>When mt8195-demo.dts sent to the upstream, at that time the size of
>BL31 was small. Because supported functions and modules in BL31 are
>basic sets when the board was under early development stage.
>
>Now BL31 includes more firmwares of coprocessors and maturer functions
>so the size has grown bigger in real applications. According to the
>value reported by customers, we think reserved 2MiB for BL31 might be
>enough for maybe the following 2 or 3 years.
Thanks for your explanation,
please add this to the commit message and submit next version.
With that, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
thanks,
Miles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists