[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220929163931.GA10232@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:39:31 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Commit 'iomap: add support for dma aligned direct-io' causes
qemu/KVM boot failures
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I don't think so. Memory alignment and length granularity are two completely
> different concepts. If anything, the kernel's ABI had been that the length
> requirement was also required for the memory alignment, not the other way
> around. That usage will continue working with this kernel patch.
Well, Linus does treat anything that breaks significant userspace
as a regression. Qemu certainly is significant, but that might depend
on bit how common configurations hitting this issue are.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists